Appearance
question:As a prompt generator for a generative AI called "Midjourney", you will create image prompts for the AI to visualize. I will give you a concept, and you will provide a detailed prompt for Midjourney AI to generate an image. Please adhere to the structure and formatting below, and follow these guidelines: Do not use the words "description" or ":" in any form. Do not place a comma between [ar] and [v]. Write each prompt in one line without using return. Structure: [1] = 做一张1920×870的Banner图，背景是一幅描绘光伏板和绿色草地背景的插图，写实摄影，放在草地上的户外景观的光伏板，远处的地平线上看不到建筑物和树木。图片中有蓝天白云，印象派风格的光伏电站。背景是绿草蓝天。地面上一些大型光伏板的边缘周围有白色的工商业储能柜。图片左边三分之一是有透明度的渐变色，可以让我放置文字。 [2] = a detailed description of [1] with specific imagery details. [3] = a detailed description of the scene's environment. [4] = a detailed description of the compositions. [5] = a detailed description of the scene's mood, feelings, and atmosphere. [6] = A style (e.g. photography, painting, illustration, sculpture, artwork, paperwork, 3D, etc.) for [1]. [7] = a detailed description of the scene's mood, feelings, and atmosphere. [ar] = Use "--ar 16:9" for horizontal images, "--ar 9:16" for vertical images, or "--ar 1:1" for square images. [v] = Use "--niji" for Japanese art style, or "--v 5" for other styles. Formatting: Follow this prompt structure: "/imagine prompt: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [ar] [v]". Your task: Create 4 distinct prompts for each concept [1], varying in details description, environment,compositions,atmosphere, and realization. Write your prompts in english. Do not describe unreal concepts as "real" or "photographic". Include one realistic photographic style prompt with lens type and size. Separate different prompts with two new lines. Example Prompts: /imagine prompt: cute dog, fluffy fur, wagging tail, playful expression, sitting on a grassy field, under a clear blue sky, with a colorful collar, in a natural and vibrant setting, by a lake, captured with a Nikon D750 camera, 50mm lens, shallow depth of field, composition focused on the dog's face, capturing its joyful spirit, in a style reminiscent of William Wegman's iconic dog portraits. --ar 1:1 --v 5.2 /imagine prompt: beautiful women in the coffee shop, elegant and sophisticated, sipping a cup of steaming coffee, natural sunlight streaming through the window, soft and warm color tones, vintage decor with cozy armchairs and wooden tables, a bookshelf filled with classic novels, delicate porcelain teacups, a hint of aromatic coffee beans in the air, captured by a Leica M10 camera, 35mm lens, capturing the essence of timeless beauty, composition focused on the woman's face and hands, reminiscent of a painting by Leonardo da Vinci. --ar 1:1 --v 5.2 /imagine prompt: A captivating Halo Reach landscape with a Spartan amidst a battlefield, fallen enemies around, smoke and fire in the background, emphasizing the Spartan's determination and bravery, detailed environment blending chaos and beauty, Illustration, digital art, --ar 16:9 --v 5
answer:/imagine prompt: Create a 1920x870 banner image featuring a realistic photograph of outdoor solar panels placed on a green grassy field, with a clear blue sky and fluffy white clouds, an impressionist style solar power station, industrial energy storage units around the edges of the larger solar panels, a gradient color overlay on the left third for text placement. --ar 16:9 --v niji /imagine prompt: Visualize a picturesque scene of a vast solar panel field set in a serene countryside environment, with lush green grass and a vibrant blue sky, no visible horizon structures, a mix of industrial and natural elements, capturing the essence of sustainability and eco-friendliness, in a detailed illustration style. --ar 16:9 --v 5 /imagine prompt: Imagine a stunning image showcasing a modern solar power station on a beautifully landscaped grass field, surrounded by white industrial energy storage units, set against a backdrop of clear blue skies and fluffy white clouds, evoking feelings of peace and environmental conservation, in a realistic photograph style shot with a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, 24-70mm lens. --ar 16:9 --v niji /imagine prompt: Picture a scene of a solar panel field integrated seamlessly into a tranquil rural landscape, with no visible buildings or trees on the distant horizon, the composition focused on the green grass, blue sky, and white cloud background, capturing a sense of harmony between technology and nature, in a painterly style reminiscent of Claude Monet's landscapes. --ar 16:9 --v 5
question:F C2 A2 change to 4
answer:Your question seems to involve a conversion or transformation of elements using a pattern or rule, specifically "F C2 A2 change to 4." This statement is a bit ambiguous without additional context, but I'll attempt to interpret it in a general computational sense. Given the elements and their transformation, "F C2 A2 change to 4," one possible interpretation is that you're describing a rule or a pattern to apply to a sequence or set of data. Let's break it down: - You have the elements: F, C2, A2. - You're looking for how these elements change to 4. Based on the provided information and common patterns in sequences or computational transformations, there are a few plausible interpretations, but none are directly clear without additional context: 1. **Alphanumeric Pattern or Value Assignment**: Each letter or symbol corresponds to a value, and you're looking to identify a relationship that equates to 4. For instance, if we assign F=6 (6th letter of the alphabet), C=3 (3rd letter of the alphabet), and A=1 (1st letter of the alphabet), then interpreting "C2 A2" could somehow relate to the operation to get 4. This interpretation is speculative without a clear rule. 2. **Mathematical Operations Based on Positions or Values**: If C2 and A2 are seen as positions or values needing manipulation, there might be a mathematical operation involved. However, without a clear operational context (addition, subtraction, etc.), it's difficult to say how they transform into 4. 3. **Pattern Transformation in a Specific Domain**: In programming or specific domain languages, such interpreation could correspond to a function or operation that isn't explicit here. For example, in a certain coding task or cryptic puzzle, these could be instructions or keys that relate to an operation or sequence manipulation resulting in the number 4. 4. **Literal Character Replacement or Count**: If we're looking at a sequence or a literal transformation, maybe the pattern suggests a rule for replacing or counting characters to eventually end up with the numeral '4'. Without further rules on how to transform "F C2 A2" to 4, this remains speculative. Given the broad range of potential interpretations and the lack of explicit context, it's challenging to provide an accurate translation or transformation process for "F C2 A2 change to 4." If you can provide additional rules or context, a more precise explanation or solution might be given.
question:1. The distinction between civil law and criminal law is more important to practicing lawyers because these distinctions directly impact the legal proceedings, the burden and standard of proof, and the outcomes for their clients, aligning more closely with the practical aspects of legal practice in the UK. 2. Criminal law deals with conduct that the state punishes (like murder or theft), where the state prosecutes the offender, while civil law concerns relationships between private persons, handling rights, duties, and disputes that may result in claims for compensation or injunctions. 3. If a defendant is found guilty in criminal law, they are convicted, will have a criminal record, and will be subject to a variety of punishments ranging from fines to life imprisonment. 4. If a defendant is found not guilty, they are acquitted, allowing them to leave court without punishment. 5. If the proceeding in a civil case results in judgment for the claimant, it means the defendant is found liable, and the judge may order the defendant to pay damages to the claimant. 6. The presumption of innocence means that every person charged with a criminal offense is considered to be innocent until proven guilty by the prosecution. 7. The “burden of proof” refers to the obligation of a party to prove their allegations during the proceedings (in criminal cases, this lies with the prosecution, and in civil cases, it lies with the claimant). The “standard of proof” refers to the level of certainty and the quality of evidence required to establish proof in court, which varies between criminal and civil cases. 8. The standard of proof is higher in a criminal action than in a civil one because the consequences (such as imprisonment) are more severe, requiring the court to be sure “beyond reasonable doubt” of the defendant’s guilt. 9. The principle “beyond reasonable doubt” means the prosecution must convince the court of the defendant’s guilt to a very high level of certainty, leaving no reasonable cause to believe otherwise. 10. The principle “on a balance of probabilities” means the claimant in a civil case must prove that their claim is more likely to be true than not, requiring a lower level of certainty compared to criminal cases. кратко
answer:1. Различия между гражданским и уголовным правом важны для практикующих юристов в Великобритании, так как эти различия напрямую влияют на судебные процессы, нормы и стандарты доказывания и результаты для их клиентов. 2. Уголовное право касается действий, наказуемых государством (например, убийство или кража), где государство выступает прокурором, в то время как гражданское право регулирует отношения между частными лицами, касаясь прав, обязанностей и споров, которые могут привести к требованиям о компенсации или об инъюнкциях. 3. Если обвиняемый признан виновным по уголовному делу, он осуждается, получает уголовную запись и подвергается различным наказаниям, от штрафов до пожизненного заключения. 4. Если обвиняемый признан невиновным, он оправдывается и покидает суд без взыскания. 5. В гражданском процессе, если суд постановил в пользу истца, это значит, что ответчик признан ответственным и суд может обязать его выплатить компенсацию истцу. 6. Презумпция невиновности означает, что каждый, обвиняемый в уголовном преступлении, считается невиновным до доказательства вины прокуратурой. 7. «Бремя доказывания» относится к обязанности стороны доказать свои утверждения в ходе процесса (в уголовных делах оно лежит на прокуратуре, а в гражданских - на истце). «Стандарт доказывания» относится к уровню уверенности и качеству доказательств, необходимых для установления доказательства в суде, который варьируется между уголовными и гражданскими делами. 8. Стандарт доказывания выше в уголовном деле, чем в гражданском, из-за более серьёзных последствий (таких как лишение свободы), требующих от суда быть уверенным «без разумных сомнений» в вине обвиняемого. 9. Принцип «без разумных сомнений» означает, что прокуратура должна убедить суд в виновности обвиняемого с очень высокой степенью уверенности, не оставляя разумного повода считать иначе. 10. Принцип «на основании вероятности» означает, что истец в гражданском деле должен доказать, что его требование более вероятно, чем нет, требуя более низкого уровня уверенности по сравнению с уголовными делами.
question:The study of law distinguishes between public law and private law, but in legal practice in the UK the distinction between civil law and criminal law is more important to practising lawyers. Public law relates to the state and is concerned with laws which govern processes in local and national government conflicts between an individual and the state. Private law is concerned with the relationships between individuals and corporations, and includes family law, contract law, property law, etc. Criminal law deals with certain forms of conduct for which the state reserves punishment, for example murder or theft. The state prosecutes the offender. Civil law concerns relationships between private persons, their rights and duties. It also deals with the conduct which may give rise to a claim by a legal person for compensation or injunction. When it comes to prosecution under the laws of the country it's common to speak about criminal offence but civil wrongs. Criminal and civil proceedings are usually very different. In a criminal proceeding a prosecutor prosecutes a defendant. If the verdict is "guilty", the defendant is convicted. He will have a criminal record for the crime and will be punished by one of a variety of punishments ranging from life imprisonment to a fine, which is paid to a court. If the defendant is found "not guilty" , he is acquitted and allowed to leave court without punishment. In civil cases a claimant sues a defendant or brings a claim against him. The proceeding may result in judgement for the claimant, which means that the defendant is found liable and the judge may order the defendant to pay damages. The duty to prove a case is called the burden of proof. In criminal cases the burden of proof falls on the prosecution. In other words it's the duty of the prosecution to prove guilt, the defendant doesn't have to prove his innocence. This principle is called the presumption of innocence, which means that every person charged with a criminal offence is considered to be innocent until proved guilty. The degree of proof which makes the court sure that the person is guilty is called the standard of proof. The standard of proof is higher in a criminal action than in a civil one since the penalties are stricter. In a criminal case a prosecution must prove the guilt of a criminal "beyond reasonable doubt", which means that the prosecution must make the court sure that the defendant committed the crime. If the court is not sure or has a reason for the doubt, it must acquit the defendant. In a civil action the burden of proof is on the claimant. He is required to prove his case "on a balance of probabilities", i.e. to show that his case is more probable than not. But he doesn't have to make the court sure about it; it's enough to show that the defendant was probably guilty. One and the same offence may sometimes result in both kinds of prosecution, civil and criminal. For example, the driver who injured a passer-by will not only face criminal penalties imposed by a criminal court but may have to pay compensation for injuries ordered by a civil court. ответить на контрольные вопросы по тексту кратко: Задание4. Ответьте на вопросы по тексту. 1. Why do you think the distinction between civil law and criminal law is more important to practising lawyers than the distinction between public and private law? 2. What is the difference between criminal law and civil law? 3. What happens to a defendant if he or she is found guilty? 4. What happens to a defendant if he or she is found not guilty? 5. What happens if the proceeding in a civil case results in judgement for the claimant? 6. What does the presumption of innocence mean? 7. What is the difference between "the burden of proof and "the standard of proof"? 8. Why is the standard of proof higher in a criminal action than in a civil one? 9. What does the principle "beyond reasonable doubt" mean? 10. What does the principle "on a balance of probabilities" mean?
answer:1. The distinction between civil law and criminal law is more important to practising lawyers in the UK because these distinctions have direct implications on legal proceedings, standards and burden of proof, and outcomes, which are more relevant to the daily practice of law than the broader categories of public versus private law. 2. Criminal law involves conduct punishable by the state, with the state prosecuting the offender. Civil law deals with disputes between private individuals or entities about rights, duties, and compensations. 3. If a defendant is found guilty, they are convicted, receive a criminal record, and face various possible punishments from fines to life imprisonment. 4. If a defendant is found not guilty, they are acquitted and allowed to leave court without any punishment. 5. If a civil case results in judgment for the claimant, it means the defendant is found liable and may be ordered by the judge to pay damages to the claimant. 6. The presumption of innocence implies every individual charged with a criminal offense is considered innocent until proven guilty. 7. "The burden of proof" refers to the obligation to prove one's allegations in court. "The standard of proof" indicates the level of certainty and the quality of evidence needed to establish guilt or liability. In criminal cases, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, while in civil cases, it generally falls on the claimant. 8. The standard of proof is higher in criminal actions because the outcomes (e.g., imprisonment) are more severe, requiring conviction only when the court is sure "beyond reasonable doubt." 9. The principle "beyond reasonable doubt" requires the prosecution to convince the court of the defendant's guilt to a very high degree of certainty, leaving no plausible reason to question it. 10. The principle "on a balance of probabilities" means that in civil cases, the claimant must prove that their case is more likely true than not, requiring a lower level of certainty compared to criminal cases.