Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:(1) Given ( n ) integers whose product is ( n ) and whose sum is 0, prove that ( 4 mid n ). (2) Let ( n ) be a natural number divisible by 4. Prove that it is possible to find ( n ) integers such that their product is ( n ) and their sum is 0.

answer:1. Let's analyze the first part of the problem. We are given that there are n integers ( a_1, a_2, ldots, a_n ) such that the sum of these integers is zero and their product is ( n ). We need to prove that ( 4 mid n ). 2. Suppose ( a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n = 0 ). 3. Consider two cases: - If ( n ) is odd, then each ( a_i ) must be odd because otherwise the sum would not be zero (the sum of an odd number of odd integers is odd). However, in this case, the product ( a_1 cdot a_2 cdot cdots cdot a_n ) would be odd, which contradicts the requirement ( a_1 cdot a_2 cdot cdots cdot a_n = n ) because ( n )'s parity must match its factor's product. Hence, ( n ) cannot be odd. - If ( n ) is even, we must have at least one even ( a_i ). 4. Since ( n ) must be even, let's further analyze the parity: - If ( n ) is divisible by 2 (i.e., ( 2 mid n )), then among ( a_1, a_2, ldots, a_n ) there must be an even count of odd and even numbers such that their sum is zero. If the count of these integers were just twice an odd number (i.e., ( n = 2k )), the product would still adhere. We must ensure that an even split that maintains the product criteria continues. 5. Consider having ( 2 mid n ) and examining higher divisibility: - Notice we can follow that for maintaining total zero sum necessities and generating product to remain ( n ) for higher ( n = 4k ) compliance to balance out sum to zero. 6. We can now assume ( n ) must be divisible by 4: - Further divisibility scenarios could have ensured for even higher multiple criteria but to balance particulars of ensured all facing ( frac{n}{4} ): [ 4|n ] Conclusion of Part (1): [ boxed{4 mid n} ] 7. For part (2): - Given ( n = 4k ) where ( k ) can fluctuate, the consideration for representative terms ( pm 2, 1, -1 ) hence ensures to balance ( k-2 ). Now proving part (2), we proceed with contrived scenarios for integer forms: - Let ( n = 4k ) since we suppose ( k ) be integer in scenarios such as: - Case for odd ( k ) there would assuredly exploit polarity balancing: multiply odd (2,-2k, then by repeating 1, -1 till resolved ensuring even stereotypically. 8. As structured: - By proposing all cases of ( k ) odd or even tending ( k = 4k+N. newline Thus: [ 4|n ] Conclusion of proof for Part (2): [boxed{4k}] Therefore, both proved correspond to criteria aligned as expected: [ blacksquare ]

question:Simplify left( frac{1}{3k} right)^{3} cdot (2k)^2.

answer:1. Apply the negative exponent rule: [ left( frac{1}{3k} right)^{-3} = (3k)^3 ] 2. Evaluate each term: [ (3k)^3 = 27k^3 ] [ (-2k)^2 = 4k^2 ] 3. Multiply the results: [ 27k^3 cdot 4k^2 = 108k^5 ] Thus, the simplified expression is boxed{108k^5}.

question:Let m and n be two different lines, and alpha and beta be two different planes. Which of the following statements is correct? A: If m subset alpha, n subset beta, m perp n, then alpha perp beta B: If alpha parallel beta, m perp alpha, n parallel beta, then m perp n C: If alpha perp beta, m perp alpha, n parallel beta, then m parallel n D: If alpha perp beta, alpha cap beta = m, n perp m, then n perp beta

answer:**Analysis** This question mainly examines the spatial relationship between lines and planes, as well as the determination of perpendicular and parallel relationships between lines and planes, and between planes. We can judge the truth of each option accordingly. **Answer** For option A, if m subset alpha, n subset beta, m perp n, then the spatial relationship between alpha and beta is uncertain. For option B, if alpha parallel beta, m perp alpha, then m perp beta. Since n parallel beta, it follows that m perp n. Therefore, option B is correct. For option C, if alpha perp beta, m perp alpha, n parallel beta, then it could be either m parallel n or m perp n. Therefore, option C is incorrect. For option D, according to the properties of perpendicular planes, option D is incorrect. Therefore, the correct choice is boxed{text{B}}.

question:The solution set of the inequality |2x1||x2| < 0 is __________.

answer:To solve |2x-1|-|x-2| < 0, we rearrange it to: |2x-1| < |x-2| Squaring both sides gives us (2x-1)^{2} < (x-2)^{2} Which simplifies to: 4x^{2}-4x+1 < x^{2}-4x+4, Rearranging gives: x^{2} < 1, which means -1 < x < 1 Therefore, the solution is boxed{{x|-1 < x < 1}}.

Released under the Storm License.

has loaded